If planning to rely on an auto tune, the Thundermax is probably the best system to go that route. JMHO but an "auto tune" feature, even Fuel Moto, as competent as they are, cannot design a map that will perform on the same level as a dyno tune. Thats why intake and exhuast upgrades are Stage 1 and adding cams to the mix is Stage II. Of coure, Frenchie has his opinion and I have mine I guess time will tell.Ĭlick to expand.I agree with Frenchie that intake and exhaust should be upgraded before or at the same time as upgrading cams. Or, like Jack points out, the aftermarket will find ways to outsmart the EPA. Some states have implemented "sniffer" tests that must be passed for a state inspection which is a "back door" wasy for the EPA to go after these performance partds but there are plenty of states that have not.Īlso JMHO but the motorcyle and automotive performance aftermarket is so big that if the EPA went down that road, there would probably be class action lawsuits brought agains the EPA and the final decision could work its way to SCOTUS and the EPA would lose. There has been talk about the EPA bringing the hammer down on on the aftermarket intake and exhausts for many years with no effect. If the EPA can tell Thundermax that can no longer sell their tuner? If the EPA could do that what's to stop them from telling Thundemax they cannot sell their suspendion systems? I don't see how the EPA can stop a companay from selling a product that would be like the ATF telling Colt, Ruger, Winchester, etc they couldn't sell firearms. I don't agree with Frenchie that the EPA will take on the motorcyle and automotive performance aftermarket specifically progammable tuners and hi-flow intake/exhaust systems.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |